All posts by Jeffrey Jones

Insurance claim first decision

The first opportunity for me to make a decision that would impact the outcome of the adventure was when the emergency responders, police officers specifically, inquired about transporting the vehicle from the side of the road to another location.  The vehicle was located in the breakdown lane but was not in roadworthy condition.  The police offered to contact a towing company but advised me that if they did so the car would be taken to a lot where I would incur storage costs.  I was allowed to contact a tow truck of my choosing, though I did not have a specific business in mind to call.  I made a call to someone who had access to a computer who could look into a nearby service and received a phone number to call.

While the car would not run, it could be moved by pushing on it, therefore my plan was to have the flatbed deposit the car at the entrance to my garage where I would then push it into the garage.

Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise I suggest contacting your own towing service to remove the vehicle from the accident scene and transport the vehicle to a location where you will have easy access to it.

The first thought that crossed my mind was that if the insurance company declared the vehicle to be a total loss I was going to want to keep the car if at all possible so that I could remove the various aftermarket parts that I had installed and at least sell them off individually.

I had not yet contacted the insurance company, I wanted to get some idea of the process first, but here is a summary of what took place when I did.

1) I notified the insurance company that the vehicle was involved in an accident.  They asked questions about the nature, location, and vehicles involved.  I learned that  if you’re involved with a single car accident there’s a very high likelihood the driver will be determined to be at fault, even if there are circumstances that contributed to the accident.

When I spoke to a policy specialist they went so far as to illustrate this point via an example.  They told me that if I were driving along a road and an animal appeared in the road in front of me, unless I had a comfortable margin to apply the brakes and come to a stop before reaching the animal I would be better off continuing down the road and hitting the animal.  This example was predicated on the animal not being the size of an adult moose.  They further explained that the damage sustained by my vehicle would be attributed to an ‘act of God’ and therefore I would not be at fault.  If I were to attempt to stop or avoid the animal and subsequently lose control of the vehicle and cause damage to the car I would be at fault.

In my specific case, while the road was wet and the reduced friction between the tires and road contributed to the vehicle skidding and impacting a barrier, ultimately it had been my decision to drive the car, to take that road, and to fail to keep the car on the road.

Next: Prognosis

Collision damage insurance claim

Dealing with an automotive total loss claim

When the S4 I had owned for a dozen years made an off-road excursion one rainy night my education in how insurance companies attempt to bilk consumers began.

My Audi S4 was purchased brand new in 2000, a build to order vehicle that would undergo extensive modifications during the ensuing years.  There were few aspects of the vehicle that had been untouched by aftermarket parts and nothing that had been done to the vehicle that I had not been a part of.  Beyond routine maintenance I also had a series of compression tests performed on the motor over the years and I also routinely submitted oil samples for lab analysis to ascertain the health of the engine.  The vehicle also benefited from being garaged and kept in regions with mild climates.

One unique aspect to the insurance policy I owned was that it included coverage for custom equipment that was permanently installed on the vehicle and payment in the event of a loss would be for Actual Cash Value.

When the accident occurred it was the first auto insurance claim I had ever made; the company with which I had coverage had been receiving insurance premiums from me on time for over 20 years.

Throughout the discussion of what took place to me and my car I will highlight some key points that I think may be useful for somebody else that is not familiar with the things that occur following an auto accident.

Next: First Decision

AMD Shroud Comparison

Background:

When I purchased the AMD intercoolers AMD had informed me that they do not offer shrouds.  I inquired as to why that was and they explained that there had been negligible difference when they had tried using shrouds.  The thought was that because of the large frontal area of the core, the AMD frontal area is larger than any other SMIC I have got figures on except for the Wagner RS4 – which requires extensive modification to the car to fit, this larger frontal area leaves little room for air to go anywhere except through the core.

The Setup:

After driving with the AMD intercoolers for a few days I became curious to see if I could record any difference in IAT with a shroud in place.  I wasn’t willing to spend a couple hundred dollars on a set or ER intercooler shrouds, the only ones I thought might be close to covering the AMD core, so I decided to use my stock IC shrouds.  This was not the ideal setup, but if shrouds were to make any difference I thought stock shrouds may be sufficient.

I had a well laid out course to drive where speeds could be tightly controlled.  Part way through, at about 25 minutes in, I parked on the side of the road with the motor running for two minutes, then resumed the drive for four minutes whereupon I rolled into a FATS pull.  From there I spent a few minutes driving the car back to the garage.

The Results:

The results of the two drives are shown below:

AMD Intercooler comparison with and without shrouds
AMD IC Shroud Comparison

Conclusion:

Results look mixed to me.  At the start the setup with shrouds shows a slight improvement over the non-shrouded drive, and the ambient temperature was a couple of degrees warmer when the shrouds were installed.  But around the midway point of the drive the difference disappears and never returns.  This could possibly be attributed to the type of driving being done, the first half was steady state cruising while the second half had some significant dynamic changes and an overall slower pace.

The main question I have is how the results would have looked if a larger shroud had been used.