Category Archives: Testing

Boost Logging Gear

Recently I posed a question to someone about a boost chart they had created inquiring about the gear the car was in when the log was generated.  In their response they had stated the gear was not a matter of concern as the chart was showing boost rise versus engine speed, where if it had been boost pressure versus time then it would have mattered.

This answer contradicted results I have recorded on my car but I did not have a good comparison set of data to use to illustrate my point, that gear does matter.

So I set out to collect some data when accelerating wide-open-throttle (WOT) in third gear and sixth gear and commencing the acceleration from a very low engine speed, 1000 rpm.

Recently I have been trying to refine the tune on my S4 for the actual wastegate duty cycle generated boost levels, an effort that has involved operating the turbochargers with fixed wastegate duty cycles.  I loaded up a tune that uses a fixed 95% WGDC that would allow the turbochargers to spool up at maximum rate to see how spool up compared between gear selections.

What I recorded with this purpose generated data confirmed other observations I’ve made, boost ramps up more quickly in 6th gear versus 3rd gear when plotted versus engine speed.

3rd vs 6th gear boost rise
3rd vs 6th gear boost rise

The difference is quite dramatic, by 3000 rpm the 6th gear boost pressure is 10 psi higher than at the same engine speed in 3rd gear.

On the other hand, plotting the boost rise versus time shows boost rising much more quickly in 3rd gear versus 6th gear:

3rd vs 6th Boost rise over time
3rd vs 6th Boost rise over time

 

Returning to charts plotted in the more common format, against engine speed, it can be seen that Airflow rises following the rise in Boost pressure.

3rd vs 6th MAF rise
3rd vs 6th MAF rise

 

Also rising with Intake Manifold Pressure is the pressure in the Exhaust Manifold, again following the boost pressure rise pattern for 6th and 3rd gears.

3rd vs 6th Exhaust Manifold Pressure Rise
3rd vs 6th Exhaust Manifold Pressure Rise

 

So a question now could be, if MAF and Exhaust Pressure increase with the rising Intake Manifold Boost Pressure, why is the Boost Pressure rising more rapidly in 6th gear?  What is driving the faster Boost increase in 6th gear as compared to 3rd for the same engine speeds (RPM)?

The answer probably comprises a number of contributors, but I suspect the most dominant influence is from the Exhaust Gas Temperature.  As the ‘versus time’ plot from above shows, in 6th gear the time is substantially longer for boost to rise, this would mean that there is more time to generate higher temperatures in the exhaust gas due to the components along the exhaust path heating up.  By heating up, these parts are drawing less energy from the exhaust gas stream leaving more heat energy to be extracted by the turbocharger turbine.

Taking a look at the Exhaust Gas Temperature, shown below, it can be seen that when accelerating in 6th gear the exhaust gas temperature rises a greater amount than when in 3rd gear.

3rd vs 6th EGT rise
3rd vs 6th EGT rise

 

Finally, with the Intake Air Temperature contributing the the rate of boost rise I tried to ensure that both cases were tested using similar IAT’s.  I was mostly successful as shown below.

3rd vs 6th IAT rise
3rd vs 6th IAT rise

 

Finally, what’s the point to take away from this?  That when looking at a boost log that is plotted versus engine speed it is important to consider what gear the S4 is in as that selection can greatly (10 psi difference in this case) impact the performance produced.

FrankenTurbo F4H data

The FrankenTurbo F4H turbocharger is no longer offered, but I had it for a while on my S4.  During that time I collected a significant amount of basic performance data on the car.  Recently I have been looking at turbocharger alternatives to the BW K04 and the metric shown below, 2-11 time, is something I have recorded for the candidate turbocharger systems.

Just to see how the F4H stacks up I pulled this data to compare the F4H to one of the top contenders, the TTE550.

FrankenTurbo F4H vs TTE550
FrankenTurbo F4H vs TTE550

The F4H uses a smaller compressor wheel and turbine wheel as compared to the TTE550, so the outcome is not surprising.

Below is the F4H under a range of ambient temperature conditions.

F4H 2-11 time with grouped by Ambient Temperature
F4H 2-11 time with grouped by Ambient Temperature

No surprise that as the ambient temperature increases the 2-11 time grows longer.

Revised Water Shock Accumulator

Prompted by a suggestion that a different orientation of the water shock / anti-surge accumulator would be better for this setup I took the time to rearrange the hoses for the accumulator and the nozzle supply.

Aquamist Water shock accumulator

The new orientation of the accumulator off of the tee has the fluid exiting the pump proceeding directly toward the accumulator, and then veering off 90 degrees to go to the nozzles.

A log with this new orientation is shown below:

wmi_accumulator_straight_shot

Overlaying the two accumulator orientations leads to the chart below:

wmi_accumulator_overlay

The difference around 3000 rpm is almost certain to be related to the manner in which boost built during the two sessions, rather than a result of the different orientation.

It is hard to discern if there has been any change to the quality characteristics of the flow with the change to the placement of the anti-surge accumulator; but there has not been any detrimental effects from the change so I plan to leave the accumulator in the new location.