Another product from White Dog Racing was sent to me for flow testing and comparison to the White Dog Racing bipipe products that I previously flow tested, along with the few other Audi B5 S4/RS4 bipipe options.

This time I received a 60 mm bipipe with RS4 throttle body.

I was interested to see how much of a difference adding the RS4 throttle body would make to the flow performance of the 60 mm WDR bipipe versus the S4 throttle body that was used with the prior tests, and also compared to the full RS4 intake setup.

Results:

 

The flow through the WDR-60/RS4 product far surpassed that of all the other bipipe combinations I have flow tested thus far.

Curious about how the flow would be affected by adding the silicone adapter/couplers to the inlet of the pipe, I compared three setups: bare metal, a 2.5″ coupler, and a 2.5″ to 2.25″ hump hose coupler.

Results of these three cases measured at 16″ of H2O were:

The addition of the 2.5″ coupler improved airflow measurably.  The reduction from 2.5″ to 2.25″ caused a small decrease in airflow.

Conclusion:

The White Dog Racing 60mm bipipe combined with the RS4 throttle body has achieved the highest airflow through a bipipe / throttle body combination that I have measured.

In addition to the White Dog Racing Bipipes that I flow tested a couple of days ago the box contained a set of the intercooler inlet pipes that replace the stock components for use with the Silly Rabbit Motorsport RS4 side mount intercoolers.

These inlets in addition to being made of metal are larger in diameter than the stock components they replace.

For the flow testing I attached the inlet to the SRM intercoolers and mounted them onto the flowbench.  I began with the stock hardpipes and couplers supplied with the SRM intercoolers.

Both the driver and passenger side flow performance was measured.

Then I swapped to the White Dog Racing inlet pipes and checked the airflow again.

 

Finally, for comparison with a completely stock setup I used the stock S4 intercoolers with the stock inlets.

Results:

Airflow through each of the setups was measured at a depression of 28″ of H2O.

The chart above illustrates a number of pieces of data:

1. The red bar and purple bar are the airflow readings from a stock intercooler and the SRM RS4 intercooler – without any inlet piping attached.  It is clear that in this configuration the SRM RS4 IC greatly outflows the stock intercooler.
2. The green bar shows the reduction in airflow through the stock intercooler when the stock inlet piping is attached.  There is a modest decrease in airflow as compared to the IC alone.
3. The orange and blue pair of lines are showing driver versus passenger side results of swapping inlet pipes between stock and WDR.  The passenger side has a higher airflow for each pipe arrangement.  Their is a small improvement in airflow when switching from the stock to WDR parts. (It should be pointed out that readings taken under operating conditions would be different as charge air under boost is denser and thus develops more back pressure).
4. Finally, the SRM RS4 intercooler undergoes a substantial drop in airflow with the addition of the inlet piping, regardless of whether it is stock piping or the WDR piping.

Conclusion:

The airflow through the intercooler and inlet is increased measurably, but only slightly, by using the larger White Dog Racing hard pipes, when evaluated on the flow bench.

For a typical user the larger inlet pipes may not provide much performance benefit, but for the all-out build where optimizing every part matters, the White Dog Racing hard pipes do provide measurable gains.

A box full of White Dog Racing intake parts for the Audi B5 S4/RS4 has arrived for flow testing on the PTS flowbench.  The parts, shown below, consist of a few variations of the intake bi-pipes and a set of turbocharger to intercooler hardpipes.

The intake bi-pipes cover the 54mm and 60mm tube diameters, flowing to a stock throttle body.  Within the two 54mm size pipes there are two variants, one with the MAP sensor in the stock location and one with the sensor offset.

The IC inlet pipes are intended for use with the Silly Rabbit Motorsport SMIC’s with the larger RS4 size piping.

Results:

After adding the APR bipipe and RS4 bipipe into the mix I began setting things up for testing.

One thing I noticed right away was how much lighter the White Dog Racing bipipes felt in comparison to the APR bipipe.  I set each product on a postal scale to get an idea of the relative weights.

• APR: 5lb 9 oz
• WDR-60: 2lb 9oz
• WDR-54: 2lb 7oz

Those weights are approximate as I needed to balance the products on the scale, and I did not bother to remove the MAP sensor, DV hoses, or WMI nozzles/line from the APR bipipe, but the general trend is clear, the APR bipipe weighs about twice what the White Dog Racing products weigh.

I also made a comparison of the inlet diameters:

In sequence from smallest diameter to largest:

Then it was on to the flow bench:

 

A comparison of the results is shown below:

 

Some comments on these results.

1.  The White Dog Racing bipipes performed surprising well given the use of the stock S4 throttle body.  The larger RS4 components only flowed slightly more than the WDR products.
2. I am especially impressed by the 54mm WDR product.  Enlarged aftermarket parts often pose a challenge to fit into the S4 engine compartment.  It’s likely that minimal accommodations would need to be made with this pipe yet the airflow increase over stock components is substantial.
3. The similar results measured from the RS4 components and 60mm WDR bipipe has led me to further consider the benefit of the RS4 throttle body.  These results appear to show that the stock TB is not much of a limitation on airflow with these size bipipes.  If that is the case then the effort to have an RS4 size throttle body attached to S4 intake manifold, like the SRM product that I have on hand, may not be worth it.
4. The difference in airflow between the two WDR-54 size bipipes was minimal so I averaged the two measurements to present a single value.
5. The stock bipipes were not measured at the same time as the other bipipes.  Due to potential differences in test conditions, ie equipment setup, bench calibration, atmospherics, it is possible and likely that the stock bipipes would have performed differently had they been available.  Comparing the RS4 and APR bipipes to the results recorded a few years ago when the stock pipes were tested showed those two products with a calculated airflow 7-10 CFM greater than what was recorded/measured today.  Thus it is likely that the stock bipipe datapoint slightly overstates the airflow under today’s test conditions, I estimate by 5 CFM, but it should be close enough for a general comparison.
6. The relatively lower airflow through the APR bipipe meant that I was able to measure it at 28″ of H2O, whereas the other products were measured at slightly lower depressions.  The reason for this is that the internal plate on the flow bench is spec’d to approximately 600 CFM and the other bipipes tested were able to reach that limit.  In order to standardize the results all measurements were adjusted to a 28″ H2O depression.  This adjustment was minor – the RS4 bipipe was flowed up to 24″ and the WDR bipipes flowed to 26″.

Below is the percentage increase in airflow that is gained from using the alternative bipipes.

In terms of airflow performance White Dog Racing has debuted an impressive product that gives a solid alternative to the hard to find RS4 components and a substantial improvement over stock parts.